The primary purpose of this blog is to share latest information, opinions, exchange knowledge and expertise on the field of Islamic Finance from different perspectives. The secondary purpose is to share opinions and key development of Islamic Banking and Islamic insurance in Tanzania.
Friday, June 24, 2016
Accommodation of Islamic Banking in banking regulatory frameworks-Licensing.
The effective prudential regulation of banks is as necessary and desirable in Islamic banking as it is in conventional banking. The risks of Islamic banking are those typical of financial intermediation. Accordingly, the objectives of applying prudential regulation and supervision to
Islamic financial activities are the same as the case of conventional banks: namely to pursue and maintain financial stability by ensuring the safety and soundness of banks, thereby preventing problems from having systemic repercussions.
There are various ways in which jurisdictions incorporate Islamic banking into their regulatory framework. A first approach is where the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) framework for bank regulation and supervision is considered the default regulatory and supervisory framework applicable to all banks (including Islamic banks) and, thus, no distinction is made regarding the regulatory framework between Islamic banks and conventional banks;
Under a second approach, the regulatory framework consists of a generic BCBS component, applied to all banks with references identifying provisions applying only to Islamic banks. In this case, the BCBS conceptual framework could be complemented by Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) prudential standards and guiding principles on Islamic banking, where considered appropriate, to give effect to Shariah law compliance;
Under a third approach, the separate regulatory framework accommodates Islamic banking. A wide range of approaches to regulatory framework for Islamic banking has evolved around those three approaches. Shariah compliance plays a role (explicitly or implicitly) in the supervision of Islamic banking. In the U.K., for example, the regulatory framework does not contain any prescriptions on Islamic banking or Shariah compliance.
Accordingly, the authorities do not explicitly recommend a Shariah board or the segregation of Islamic banking funds from conventional banking funds within a bank. Nonetheless, the authorities take the issue of Shariah compliance into account, albeit indirectly, when considering issues such as consumer protection, internal controls, governance, and reputation risk.
Licensing.
Jurisdictions impose different licensing requirements on applicants wishing to establish Islamic banks. In non Shariah Law jurisdictions,
where Islamic and conventional banks are present, licensing requirements do not address specifically and explicitly the issue of Shariah compliance. However, the issue of Shariah compliance does play an important indirect and implicit role in the approval process.
Where Shariah Law constitutes (or is part of) the fundamental law of the country, Shariah compliance is a key pre-condition to (and determinant of) whether a proposed request for approval of a Islamic bank would be considered favorably. Different jurisdictions issue different types of licenses to Islamic banks. Some issue a stand-alone Islamic bank will be issued with an Islamic banking license. Other jurisdictions a single (generic) banking license is issued to a bank, irrespective of whether the bank is an Islamic or a conventional bank (in some of these jurisdictions the authorities are empowered to issue only an Islamic banking license). Typically, the regulatory framework contains one set of fit and proper criteria applicable to all banks.
Accordingly, the regulatory framework does not prescribe a distinct and separate set of fit and proper criteria applicable only to Islamic banks.
In many jurisdiction, the issue of fit and proper in relation to individuals that play a key role in a bank’s Shariah compliance does not yet appear to have received sufficient attention. For example, it is not always clear whether the bank supervisory authority is empowered to make pronouncements on the fitness of individuals responsible for Shariah compliance (e.g., members of the Shariah board, the Shariah accountant, the Shariah internal auditor, the Shariah compliance officer, and the Shariah external auditor).
Few jurisdictions apply fit and proper requirements to Shariah board members and Islamic bank personnel involved in Shariah compliance. Though some jurisdictions impose requirements such as piety, standing in the community and/or recognition as a Shariah scholar, few jurisdictions (if any) impose (secular) fit and proper requirements on candidates for a Shariah board.
To continue..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment